|
|
Understanding that it is impossible to give proof a value different from that attributed in lower courts, the th Panel of the Superior Labor Court rejected the appeal of a motorbike freight operator from the Habib's chain who sought recognition of the right to provisional stability as a result of panic syndrome and, consequently, reintegration into employment. According to the lower courts, it was demonstrated that the disease has no causal or concausal relationship with the activities carried out by him. reproduction Expertise did not detect a relationship between work and the disorder developed by the motorcycle courier Reproduction In his labor complaint, the motor freight driver said that the cause of the illness was the excessive pressure he suffered from his employer in relation to the time and volume of deliveries. According to him, there was, at the time, a promotion in which delivery would be made in up to minutes, and delivery people were "extremely charged" by the company and customers, who would make complaints if the time was exceeded.
The lower court and the Greece Phone Number Regional Labor Court of the th Region (PR) rejected the request based on an expert report that ruled out the causal link between the panic disorder and the employee's activities. When examining the grievance for which the worker intended to re-discuss the case in the TST, the rapporteur, minister Lelio Bentes Corrêa, explained that it is not possible, in the extraordinary instance, to attribute a different value to the evidence than that attributed in the Labor Court and in the TRT. "Only by reviewing the evidence would it be possible to rule out the premise that the employee has a disease with no causal link or concausality with the activities carried out", he stated. The decision was unanimous. With information from the press office of the Superior Labor Cou Several constitutionality control actions are pending judgment regarding the provisions of Law , In one of these actions, the question is whether or not the beneficiary of free justice is exempt from paying the costs of the process, including whether the labor credit obtained in court can be retained to pay such expenses, such as legal fees. This aspect, vital to guaranteeing effective access to the justice system, remains unanswered by the Supreme Court .
This destructive movement of Labor Law and its related institutions is aggravated by public demonstrations by members of the Court. Participating in meetings, giving speeches, giving lectures, prejudging events promoted by employers has been quite common among STF ministers. In the demonstrations, there are frequent exaltations of the deregulation of the labor market, derogatory comments about the Labor Court and attacks on magistrates specializing in Labor Law [] . Some historical opponents of social rights even say that this situation was the result of a reaction by the STF to the stance of the Superior Labor Court — and the labor judiciary as a whole — which refused to grant a modernizing, flexible interpretation of labor standards [ ] . But this rhetoric does not hold water. The Labor Court is an institution recognized for the high quality of its decisions and for its effective performance as a civilizing instrument for labor relations in Brazil. Our justice system is well structured, has wide coverage, has an excellent technological infrastructure and has magistrates and civil servants permanently qualified for the adequate and efficient performance of functions. With years of expertise in the world of work, it has contributed significantly not only to realizing social rights, but also to ensuring greater, better and broader labor protection.
|
|
發表於 16:09:01